At 15:16 05/10/2003, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:on a sidenote - i once
played around by just adding this
garbage to a linked list and only reclaim it inside emalloc.
that way we don't need to clean it after every op.
We plan to completely remove the garbage mechanism after beta 2.
Zeev
-
"Thies C. Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on a sidenote - i once played around by just adding this
> garbage to a linked list and only reclaim it inside emalloc.
> that way we don't need to clean it after every op.
>
> this won't fix the 25547 but it would make fixing it
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 08:16 AM 10/4/2003 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> >Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don't like this patch because already the gc is a very sensitive
> >> mechanism and we're not allowed to collect
At 08:16 AM 10/4/2003 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't like this patch because already the gc is a very sensitive
> mechanism and we're not allowed to collect too much or too little at any
> given time. Your patch can easily lead to too much
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't like this patch because already the gc is a very sensitive
> mechanism and we're not allowed to collect too much or too little at any
> given time. Your patch can easily lead to too much being collected before
> previous zval's are free
Hi,
I don't like this patch because already the gc is a very sensitive
mechanism and we're not allowed to collect too much or too little at any
given time. Your patch can easily lead to too much being collected before
previous zval's are freed which can lead to problems (this mechanism was
ref
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #25543 is documentation 'bug', what exactly does your
> patch fix? I don't see anything wrong with set_error_handler()..
>
Oops, #25547 is the right number.
Moriyoshi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscri
On October 3, 2003 05:43 am, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> #25543 is documentation 'bug', what exactly does your
> patch fix? I don't see anything wrong with set_error_handler()..
>
> --Jani
>
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
> >Attached is a fix for bug #25543 (Error in set_erro
#25543 is documentation 'bug', what exactly does your
patch fix? I don't see anything wrong with set_error_handler()..
--Jani
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Attached is a fix for bug #25543 (Error in set_error_handler() definition),
>which is caused b
