Le lun. 12 juil. 2021 à 11:42, Patrick ALLAERT a
écrit :
> Le lun. 12 juil. 2021 à 09:51, Nikita Popov a
> écrit :
>
>> I'm also not sure where this would be actually useful (though I'm okay
>> with including it, as the functionality itself seems sensible). As Patrick
>> Allaert suggested this,
Le lun. 12 juil. 2021 à 09:51, Nikita Popov a écrit :
> I'm also not sure where this would be actually useful (though I'm okay
> with including it, as the functionality itself seems sensible). As Patrick
> Allaert suggested this, maybe he can comment on some use cases.
>
I can't really see a use
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 12:08 PM Pierre wrote:
> Le 09/07/2021 à 10:45, Joe Watkins a écrit :
> > Morning internals,
> >
> > While discussing some of the details of the first class callable RFC, it
> > became apparent that fake closures (created by Closure::fromCallable) are
> > not currently comp
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, at 4:51 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:45 AM Joe Watkins wrote:
>
> > Morning internals,
> >
> > While discussing some of the details of the first class callable RFC, it
> > became apparent that fake closures (created by Closure::fromCallable) are
> > not
Le 09/07/2021 à 10:45, Joe Watkins a écrit :
Morning internals,
While discussing some of the details of the first class callable RFC, it
became apparent that fake closures (created by Closure::fromCallable) are
not currently comparable in a useful way.
Although this is not directly related to t
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:45 AM Joe Watkins wrote:
> Morning internals,
>
> While discussing some of the details of the first class callable RFC, it
> became apparent that fake closures (created by Closure::fromCallable) are
> not currently comparable in a useful way.
>
> Although this is not dir
