Nikita,
On Apr 9, 2015 8:56 AM, "Nikita Popov" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Niklas Keller wrote:
>
> > Hi Nikita,
> >
> > I like the new display format, but there's one thing I miss. If you
> > replace the exception name for warnings and fatals, how does a user know
> > which exce
On 09/04/15 13:55, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> I like the new display format, but there's one thing I miss. If you
>> > replace the exception name for warnings and fatals, how does a user know
>> > which exception he has to catch?
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. The first part of the me
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Niklas Keller wrote:
> Hi Nikita,
>
> I like the new display format, but there's one thing I miss. If you
> replace the exception name for warnings and fatals, how does a user know
> which exception he has to catch?
>
> Regards, Niklas
>
Sorry, I don't understand
Am 09.04.2015 10:04 schrieb "Nikita Popov" :
>
> New message:
>
> UnexpectedValueException: Failed to open directory "" in %s on line %d
>...
> Essentially exceptions would display like ordinary error, but with "Fatal
> error" / "Warning" / ... replaced by the exception name, and showing a
> stack
Hi Nikita,
I like the new display format, but there's one thing I miss. If you replace
the exception name for warnings and fatals, how does a user know which
exception he has to catch?
Regards, Niklas
Nikita Popov schrieb am Do., 09.04.2015, 10:04:
> Hi internals!
>
> A lot of people have been
