Am 26.08.2012 01:57, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
> So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
> signature which contains also the default values?
> I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have
optional
> arguments and non null default
>
>
> > So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
> > signature which contains also the default values?
> > I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have optional
> > arguments and non null defaults must be really a PITA for you.
>
> I think what he was al
On 26/08/2012, at 4:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> 2012.08.25. 19:50, "Sebastian Krebs" ezt írta:
>>
>> Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>>
>>>
>>>would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>>>if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of
2012.08.25. 19:50, "Sebastian Krebs" ezt írta:
>
> Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
>
>>
>> would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>> if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of
the
>> ternary operator.
>>
>>
>> Couldn't belie
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
ternary operator.
Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
snip
Don't know, what you are ta
>
>
>> would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
>> if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
>> ternary operator.
>>
>
> Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
>
snip
> Don't know, what you are talking about, but the notice _is_ the current
> behaiour a
Am 24.08.2012 23:11, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs mailto:krebs@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
operators the
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
> implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the
> short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the assignment
> like t
Am 19.08.2012 00:20, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short ternary
operator shoul
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
> it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
> ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with t
On 17/08/12 23:41, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
> implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
> operators the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction
> with the assignment like the other binary
12 matches
Mail list logo
