Hi Stats,
2012/1/20 Stas Malyshev :
> I'd propose to make a binary-compatible change for 5.3 and 5.4.1, and
> discuss what we do for trunk - I still like the idea of keeping less
> handlers better, and if that means we can have the same patch for all
> branches, then it's an added bonus.
Ok, then
Hi!
We can make new session ID in PS_OPEN_FUNC() or PS_READ_FUNC() always
when ID is not already initialized one, by calling private validation
function from
PS_OPEN_FUNC() or PS_READ_FUNC(). However, I think it's more cleaner to
keep PS module's modular architecture.
Current session module's c
Hi Stats,
2012/1/20 Stas Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
>
>> Hi Stats,
>>
>> Ok, I'll hold committing to 5.4, but commit it only to trunk.
>>
>> Any comments form anyone? for committing to trunk?
>> Patch details and user land counter measure are in RFC.
>
>
> Re-reading the discussion, I see that the questi
Hi!
Hi Stats,
Ok, I'll hold committing to 5.4, but commit it only to trunk.
Any comments form anyone? for committing to trunk?
Patch details and user land counter measure are in RFC.
Re-reading the discussion, I see that the question of why we need
separate validator handler is still unreso
Hi Stats,
Ok, I'll hold committing to 5.4, but commit it only to trunk.
Any comments form anyone? for committing to trunk?
Patch details and user land counter measure are in RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict_sessions
BTW, if we hold this patch, I think we should write patch that does
not tou
I added a patch to bug #60809. If it's ok I can commit it.
Pierrick
On 19 January 2012 20:55, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> I would like to commit session adaption patch to 5.4, since it
>> does not change current session module behavior by default
>> and affected application can be protecte
Hi!
I would like to commit session adaption patch to 5.4, since it
does not change current session module behavior by default
and affected application can be protected by changing php.ini
setting. As you already know, it requires structure changes and
it would be binary incompatible if add it l
Hi Stats,
I would like to commit session adaption patch to 5.4, since it
does not change current session module behavior by default
and affected application can be protected by changing php.ini
setting. As you already know, it requires structure changes and
it would be binary incompatible if add
hi Marius,
You can do it yourself :-)
Cheers,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:50 AM, marius adrian popa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> As we are nearing the release of 5.4.0, I'd like to ask everybody not to
>> commit anything to 5.4 branch without the ap
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As we are nearing the release of 5.4.0, I'd like to ask everybody not to
> commit anything to 5.4 branch without the approval of one of the RMs (myself
> or David) from now until release of 5.4.0. Unless something critical for
> 5.4.0
ah right, thanks Patrick :)
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 08.01.2012 13:37, schrieb Pierre Joye:
>> As far as I know, the only BC so far is the request time float
>> addition to restore the previous behavior. I will do it this afternoon
>> if nobody catches up wit
Am 08.01.2012 13:37, schrieb Pierre Joye:
> As far as I know, the only BC so far is the request time float
> addition to restore the previous behavior. I will do it this afternoon
> if nobody catches up with it before :)
That was already restored (in r321828).
--
Sebastian Bergmann
hi David, Stas,
As far as I know, the only BC so far is the request time float
addition to restore the previous behavior. I will do it this afternoon
if nobody catches up with it before :)
Cheers,
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As we are nearing the release of 5
13 matches
Mail list logo
