Hi,
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> > Currently you cannot serialize a closure. That certainly makes sense.
[...]
> I guess its a dont go there thing, as you also run into trouble with
> "use"-d variables.
In the long run, I guess, we should try to reach it. Ignor
Although this may open a lot of pitfalls, I'd support the idea to
serialize Closures.
My concern is about recovering a Closure from a user-persisted state.
People are able to do weird things, and we should be aware of that.
Just need to keep in mind of a dictate that says: "Never underestimate
the
On 07.04.2009, at 09:55, Richard Quadling wrote:
Hi.
Currently you cannot serialize a closure. That certainly makes sense.
But would it be possible/feasible that a closure could be serialized
if the value returned was the byte code used by the engine to execute
the compiled closure?
Or is th
