On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:37 +0300, Adi Nita wrote:
>> Perhaps a better idea would be to group the ones that we already have
>> under a common namespace. But this is no news, though.
>
> Even then it would be unlikely that we add another spe
Completely agree. Adding another specialized string function wouldn't be
worth in this case. I was just trying to divert the attention :) to PHP
(still) not using namespaced functionalities even where it makes sense the
most (text / string, array etc.)
2010/9/30 Johannes Schlüter
> On Thu, 2010
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:37 +0300, Adi Nita wrote:
> Perhaps a better idea would be to group the ones that we already have
> under a common namespace. But this is no news, though.
Even then it would be unlikely that we add another special purpose
function. This would have to be an important featur
Perhaps a better idea would be to group the ones that we already have under
a common namespace. But this is no news, though.
Adrian
2010/9/30 Johannes Schlüter
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 15:11 +0200, Andre Baumeier wrote:
> > Am 05.09.2010 um 15:06 schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> >
> > > preg_match(
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 15:11 +0200, Andre Baumeier wrote:
> Am 05.09.2010 um 15:06 schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
>
> > preg_match('/PHP (.*) swesome/', 'PHP is awesome', $matches);
> >
>
> preg_match should be slower?
Was that a question or a statement?
I doubt it is really measurable and not wort
Am 05.09.2010 um 15:06 schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> preg_match('/PHP (.*) swesome/', 'PHP is awesome', $matches);
>
preg_match should be slower?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 21:52 +0200, Alex Baumann wrote:
> Hi!
> Since I'm using this function in each project I'm working on, how about
> making it a built-in function?
>
> function between ($text, $between, $and) {
> $start = strpos($text, $between)+strlen($between);
> if ($start === fa
