Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2005-07-15 Thread Wez Furlong
It's a bug, but not critical. --Wez. On 7/15/05, Sean Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I rerolled Beta 3 due to some critical patches that needed to make it in. > > Please download and give a sanity test. If no new critical bug is found > > I'll put it up this evening o

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2005-07-15 Thread Sean Coates
Andi Gutmans wrote: I rerolled Beta 3 due to some critical patches that needed to make it in. Please download and give a sanity test. If no new critical bug is found I'll put it up this evening or tomorrow. I might be too late, here, but when building: ./configure --with-mssql --with-pdo-dblib

RE: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2005-07-13 Thread Mike Robinson
> Thanks as usual to Edin for the quick turnaround on the > Windows builds. +4,294,967,295 Best, Mike Robinson -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1 Take #2

2003-12-17 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Andi, On 17 Dec 2003, at 23:12, Andi Gutmans wrote: If there aren't any beta show stoppers (i.e. it doesn't format your harddrive) I'll re-roll final beta 3 tomorrow it formatted my harddrive, erm no. But see: http://jan.prima.de/~jan/php_test_results_20031217_2353.txt (MacOS X.3) http://jan.pr

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 11:04 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: > >On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > > > Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net. > > > buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok) > > > buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok) > > > >Versions are

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:04 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net. > buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok) > buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok) Versions are ok, but you need the patched libtool from snaps.php.net. Any chance w

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Are these OK too? That's on www.php.net. > buildconf: autoconf version 2.13 (ok) > buildconf: libtool version 1.4.3 (ok) Versions are ok, but you need the patched libtool from snaps.php.net. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing Li

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
At 11:01 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Ouch :) > I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't). > I'll re-roll tomorrow morning. > Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right > version

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Ouch :) > I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't). > I'll re-roll tomorrow morning. > Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right > versions of autoconf/libtool and so on? snaps.php.net Der

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3 RC 1

2003-12-17 Thread Andi Gutmans
Ouch :) I was sure cvs.php.net works for rolling RCs (I know my machine doesn't). I'll re-roll tomorrow morning. Can someone tell me which php.net machine is updated with all of the right versions of autoconf/libtool and so on? Jani, see why I needed an RC1 :) Andi At 10:43 PM 12/17/2003 +0100, D

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-17 Thread Zeev Suraski
#22510 is refixed. The other one is not a real issue (it died out right before, now it runs till the end - we'll try to fix the leaks though). Zeev At 17:49 17/12/2003, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: On December 16, 2003 11:23 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey guys, > > A couple of weeks too late, but I'd

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-17 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On December 16, 2003 11:23 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey guys, > > A couple of weeks too late, but I'd like to roll Beta 3 tomorrow. > The crucial bug we wanted fixing (the return reference problem) was fixed. > Other little things can be fixed during the code freeze after B3 whilst > getting ready

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Eduardo R. Maciel
>Derick Rethans wrote: >> From what I saw more people don't want those >>suckyCaps . > >Sorry Derick, but it seems that more people want >studlyCaps in >Object-Oriented PHP and underscores in procedural PHP. >Cristiano Duarte It would make more sense. As was mentioned before, OO parts of PHP in

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Cristiano Duarte
Derick Rethans wrote: > From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps . Sorry Derick, but it seems that more people want studlyCaps in Object-Oriented PHP and underscores in procedural PHP. Cristiano Duarte -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Christian Stocker
On 12/4/03 12:28 AM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we would then code freeze and prepare for RC1. I am cool with the Beta 3 date, but I think it would be helpful if we could get a

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:14:06 +0100 (CET) Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps . Que? pierre -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > tracked because of the whole __toString() issue. Now it's resolved and > SimpleXML still works like a charm I'd like to aim for Beta 3 next week > (including the StudlyCaps standard adoption). >From what I saw more people don't want those suckyCaps . Der

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-04 Thread Derick Rethans
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we > would then code freeze and prepare for RC1. I would really like to see the shutdown order fixed before beta. It's something quite vital to the whole dtors thingy. Derick -- PHP I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Beta 3

2003-12-03 Thread Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Can we aim for a definitive 9th December (my birthday)? After Beta 3 we > would then code freeze and prepare for RC1. I am cool with the Beta 3 date, but I think it would be helpful if we could get a list of patches and new features people are planning to