On 09/10/13 07:39, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Gordon Oheim wrote:
Since the feedback so far was few but positive, I'll advance the RFC to
the next stage. Apart from this, any feedback is still welcome.
Thanks and Regards, Gordon
For the lazy folks, this is the RFC
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Gordon Oheim wrote:
> Since the feedback so far was few but positive, I'll advance the RFC to
> the next stage. Apart from this, any feedback is still welcome.
>
> Thanks and Regards, Gordon
>
For the lazy folks, this is the RFC Gordon is talking about:
https://w
I quite like the shortened constructors. You did a good job of explaining
how it it would work in a variety of situations and I have no questions on
the behavior of the basic proposal.
I don't like the Alternate Syntax: the difference between the current
behavior and the proposed is triggered only
