Hi Julien,
On Wed, April 29, 2015 17:50, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, April 29, 2015 15:35, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi,
On Sun, A
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Leigh wrote:
>
> On 29 April 2015 at 14:21, Anatol Belski wrote:
>>
>> after the recent discussion on IRC I would like to express the rediness to
>> take on this job. As Kalle is willing to take this role as well, it'd
>> probably make sense to hear what everyone
hi Julien.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, April 29, 2015 15:35, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, April
On 29 April 2015 at 14:21, Anatol Belski wrote:
>
> after the recent discussion on IRC I would like to express the rediness to
> take on this job. As Kalle is willing to take this role as well, it'd
> probably make sense to hear what everyone thinks about my proposition.
> Possibly it could come t
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
> On Wed, April 29, 2015 15:35, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, April 5, 2015 09:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >>
> >>> bumping the thread as we should st
Sounds good too :)
Three will have plenty to do very soon
On Apr 29, 2015 8:35 PM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, April 5, 2015 09:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> > bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (
On Wed, April 29, 2015 15:35, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, April 5, 2015 09:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>> bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching
>>> out 7.0,
>>> tagging the first alpha or m
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, April 5, 2015 09:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching out
> > 7.0,
> > tagging the first alpha or more likely beta) if we wanna keep up with
> > https://wiki.php.net/
Hi,
On Sun, April 5, 2015 09:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching out
> 7.0,
> tagging the first alpha or more likely beta) if we wanna keep up with
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline
>
after the recent discussion on IRC I would like to
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching out 7.0,
> tagging the first alpha or more likely beta) if we wanna keep up with
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline
>
I definitely think we should roll a packag
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Leigh wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming
> in
> >> that are going to target 7.1,
2015.03.22. 14:33 ezt írta ("Yannick Komotir" ):
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry if I am wrong but why it is not people that started php 7/ng
> project ? Dmitry, Nikita or Xichen ?
I'm fairly sure any of those three would have overwhelming support for
RMing if they would decide to volunteer.
(Personally I
On 22 March 2015 at 13:33, Yannick Komotir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry if I am wrong but why it is not people that started php 7/ng
> project ? Dmitry, Nikita or Xichen ?
>
Personal opinion: I'd prefer all of these people had more time to work on
code, and didn't have to worry about RM duties :)
Hi,
I am sorry if I am wrong but why it is not people that started php 7/ng
project ? Dmitry, Nikita or Xichen ?
On 22/03/15 01:38, Leigh wrote:
> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming in
> that are going to target 7.1, I think it's time we branched master and
> selected a release manager (or two) for 7.0.
Is there any need to allow commits to master which are targeted beyond
On 22 March 2015 at 07:49, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> From A RM point of view, I agree with other here, I could not think of
> a better person than you as one of the RMs. You did and still do a
> fantastic job, keeping things up and running, awesome communications,
> etc. As a 2nd RM, I would like som
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Leigh wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming in
>> that are going to target 7.1, I think it's time we branched master and
>> selected a release manage
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Leigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming in
> that are going to target 7.1, I think it's time we branched master and
> selected a release manager (or two) for 7.0.
>
> Traditionally the newer RM from the pre
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Leigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming in
> that are going to target 7.1, I think it's time we branched master and
> selected a release manager (or two) for 7.0.
>
I would branch only in time for the firs
Hi Leigh
2015-03-22 2:38 GMT+01:00 Leigh :
> Hi all,
>
> With 7.0 feature freeze in effect, and proposals and RFCs still coming in
> that are going to target 7.1, I think it's time we branched master and
> selected a release manager (or two) for 7.0.
I expressed sometime last year after we named
20 matches
Mail list logo
