On 26 August 2014 18:31, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> Does anyone have any objections to this being included in 5.4?
>>
>> Thanks, Chris
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/DaveRandom/php-src/commit/d4da5d8c1dae152f7aa5f0dd09b1f29b51f48c89
>
> I think it's ok for 5.4.
>
Great, thanks :-)
--
P
Hi!
> Does anyone have any objections to this being included in 5.4?
>
> Thanks, Chris
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/DaveRandom/php-src/commit/d4da5d8c1dae152f7aa5f0dd09b1f29b51f48c89
I think it's ok for 5.4.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
--
Hi Stas
On 19 August 2014 00:59, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Moving this out of other topics into its own: according to the release
> RFC, we should have 5.4 have 2 years of bugfixes & one year of security
> fixes. Since 5.4 was released in March 2012, we're already past 2 year
> mark. However
On 22/08/14 13:56, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Apparently the fix for #67724 [2] caused #67865 [1], but I already have
>>> a fix for the fix (oh my) [3].
>>
>> I've reverted it from 5.4.32, but please commit this fix in 5.4. As phar
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Apparently the fix for #67724 [2] caused #67865 [1], but I already have
>> a fix for the fix (oh my) [3].
>
> I've reverted it from 5.4.32, but please commit this fix in 5.4. As phar
> is currently broken, fix for this qualifies as
Hi!
> Apparently the fix for #67724 [2] caused #67865 [1], but I already have
> a fix for the fix (oh my) [3].
I've reverted it from 5.4.32, but please commit this fix in 5.4. As phar
is currently broken, fix for this qualifies as important.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: h
On 19/08/14 01:59, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
> - EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, we do not accept new non-security bugfixes into
> 5.4 branch unless they are very important ones (and that is only because
> people may, in theory, have pending patches and we didn't give advance
> notice). Importance would have t
2014.08.19. 1:59 ezt írta ("Stas Malyshev" ):
>
> Hi!
>
> Moving this out of other topics into its own: according to the release
> RFC, we should have 5.4 have 2 years of bugfixes & one year of security
> fixes. Since 5.4 was released in March 2012, we're already past 2 year
> mark. However, we're
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Moving this out of other topics into its own: according to the release
> RFC, we should have 5.4 have 2 years of bugfixes & one year of security
> fixes. Since 5.4 was released in March 2012, we're already past 2 year
> mark. However,
I'd like to see https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/694 /
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/765 in so FPM in 5.4 will work properly
with Apache 2.4.10+'s mod_proxy_fcgi.
David
On 19 Aug 2014, at 01:59, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Moving this out of other topics into its own: according
10 matches
Mail list logo