Hi Ondřej:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:09:37AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> I probably don't know enough about procedures here. But if you know
> that the tests are failing, you should move them to XFAIL category,
> don't you?
The tests that are expected to fail are marked XFAIL. The two other
Hi all,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:33, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi Stas:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:31:56PM -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>>
>> We still have tons of failures in DateTime IIRC and that's because
>> of the buggy three-letter timezones.
>
> There are bugs with both type 1 (regula
Hi Stas:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:31:56PM -0700, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
> We still have tons of failures in DateTime IIRC and that's because
> of the buggy three-letter timezones.
There are bugs with both type 1 (regularly created datetimes) and type 2
(datetimes created using three letter tim
Hi!
On 8/22/11 3:27 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Ondrej!
As far I remember, Daniel fixed some of the (numerous) failing
datetime tests. Can you try to give it a run using current 5.3 branche
pls?
We still have tons of failures in DateTime IIRC and that's because of
the buggy three-letter timezo
hi Ondrej!
As far I remember, Daniel fixed some of the (numerous) failing
datetime tests. Can you try to give it a run using current 5.3 branche
pls?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> This is stripped down bug list diff (only + or - lines included)
> between *Debian* 5.3.6-1
