Richard Quadling wrote:
> Hi.
>
> With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
>
> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
> seconds beh
2008/12/18 Steph Fox :
> Hi Richard,
>
>> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
>> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> I make it 23, according to the info on that page...
>
>> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
>> se
No: http://derickrethans.nl/php_lags_23_seconds.php
Hm, Wikipedia's apparently less than open there -
[12:36] so how come PHP's different?
[12:36] olson has information on it, but it's never used
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Richard Quadling wrote:
> With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
>
> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is
Hi Richard,
In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
I make it 23, according to the info on that page...
So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
seconds behind UTC?
No.
This would be
Richard Quadling wrote:
> Hi.
>
> With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this?
>
> In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have
> been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972.
>
> So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34
> seconds
