On Thu, Mar 25, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Peter Stalman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 5:40 PM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > In response to the feedback that the savings in typing volume is small,
> > that's true but also not the main point. The main point is to allow and
> > encourage functions to b
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:23 AM Levi Morrison via internals <
internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
> [...]
> Instead of writing this:
>
> ```
> class A
> {
> public function method($arg1)
> {
> return expr($arg1);
> }
> }
> ```
>
> I can write this:
>
> ```
> class A {
> function method($ar
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 11:22 PM, Levi Morrison via internals
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:02 PM Mike Schinkel wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 24, 2021, at 8:39 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>>
>>> As requested, splitting off the short-functions RFC to its own thread.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.php.net
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 5:40 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> In response to the feedback that the savings in typing volume is small,
> that's true but also not the main point. The main point is to allow and
> encourage functions to be written an in "expression style", that is, as
> actual functions a
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:02 PM Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> > On Mar 24, 2021, at 8:39 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >
> > As requested, splitting off the short-functions RFC to its own thread.
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-functions
> >
> > In response to the feedback that the savings in typ
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 8:39 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> As requested, splitting off the short-functions RFC to its own thread.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/short-functions
>
> In response to the feedback that the savings in typing volume is small,
> that's true but also not the main point. T
