I'm not a voter, but I'd like to lobby for a fancier
E_STRICT...
E_STRICT is sounding more and more like runtime "lint".
I very much miss lint. (I'm sure it's still around, but
I've been programming in only php for the last few years.)
A key feature of lint that made it usable was that you
could
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 06:24:35PM +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> So that E_STRICT notices introduced in 6.x will become E_FATALs only in 7.0
> and so on.
That's pretty much what I was going to say.
To be clear, unlike the commit that was recently reverted, E_STRICT should
never be moved into
On 31.05.2006 11:46, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
right now the fate of E_STRICT error messages is uncertain. A few
people think those should change to fatal after a reasonable amount of
time, is two years (e.g. 5.0.0) reasonable. A few even think a minor
v
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> right now the fate of E_STRICT error messages is uncertain. A few
> people think those should change to fatal after a reasonable amount of
> time, is two years (e.g. 5.0.0) reasonable. A few even think a minor
> version like 5.1 to 5.2 is enough but t
I'd back the majority over this. Changes from E_STRICT to fatal in minor
versions is out of the question; most people still use PHP 4.3.*, and
this is something you're failing to consider here.
So that'd be a major version bump for them. :)
If they'd had E_STRICT messages in 4.3.*, sure...
right now the fate of E_STRICT error messages is uncertain. A few
people think those should change to fatal after a reasonable amount of
time, is two years (e.g. 5.0.0) reasonable. A few even think a minor
version like 5.1 to 5.2 is enough but the majortiy (at least i guess
so) wants the change o
Hi Marcus,
right now the fate of E_STRICT error messages is uncertain. A few
people think those should change to fatal after a reasonable amount of
time, is two years (e.g. 5.0.0) reasonable. A few even think a minor
version like 5.1 to 5.2 is enough but the majortiy (at least i guess
so) wants