Hi Dan,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>
> Hi Dustin,
>
> I try to avoid sounding too negative when people come up with ideas
> that I might not agree with. HoweverI feel obliged to give honest
> feedback earlier rather than later; I can't see any circumstances
> under whi
On 7 January 2016 at 20:25, Dustin Wheeler wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have drafted an RFC that describes a proposal to add this feature to
> the language.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/friend-classes
Hi Dustin,
I try to avoid sounding too negative when people come up with ideas
that I might
Dan,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>
> FYI The voting RFC is reasonably clear on new syntax and the passing
> level: https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting
>
> "For these reasons, a feature affecting the language itself (new
> syntax for example) will be considered as 'accep
Hi François,
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, François Laupretre wrote:
>
> * There is another inheritance property I didn't include in my initial
> article, and I think that should be described :
>
> class Base {
> friend BaseFriend;
> protected $base_prop;
> static protec
On 8 January 2016 at 01:33, François Laupretre wrote:
> Hi Dustin,
> * About the voter's majority, I see that as a pure addition and there's no
> BC break. So, I would say that a 50%+1 majority should be enough. To be
> confirmed.
>
FYI The voting RFC is reasonably clear on new syntax and the pa
Hi Dustin,
thanks for this nice work !
Here are some comments and thoughts :
* There is another inheritance property I didn't include in my initial
article, and I think that should be described :
class Base {
friend BaseFriend;
protected $base_prop;
static protected $
