On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/10/2016 10:07 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>> I would be most surprised to find windows users running php command
>> line, but I suppose I am somewhat out of the loop on that side. All my
>> windows users run PHP on a web server and have troub
On 5/10/2016 10:07 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> I would be most surprised to find windows users running php command
> line, but I suppose I am somewhat out of the loop on that side. All my
> windows users run PHP on a web server and have trouble even accessing
> the command line.
>
I am using Window
Le 11/05/2016 à 06:59, Joe Watkins a écrit :
Morning,
In this case, it is currently impossible to write a single
configuration file that will work in both environments, forcing
developers to manually maintain two separate versions of the file.
I'm aware this has been mentioned in this thread,
On 11/05/16 05:59, Joe Watkins wrote:
> The idea that we could one day have a configuration file for both
> platforms seems like a pipe dream, so this can't really be considered a
> "step closer" to that; It's never going to happen.
That is my thought as well. Getting windows installations of PHP
Morning,
> In this case, it is currently impossible to write a single configuration
file that will work in both environments, forcing developers to manually
maintain two separate versions of the file.
I'm aware this has been mentioned in this thread, and I've read the open
issue disclaimer.
The
Hi,
Le 10/05/2016 à 22:07, Lester Caine a écrit :
Windows did not worry about which extension was used
in the past, but nowadays the problem is ensuring the correct build of
extension is accessed and while 32bit is still the safer base, it's all
too easy to get them mixed up with 64bit builds.
Hi Lester,
Le 10/05/2016 à 21:01, Lester Caine a écrit :
The idea has been proposed before, but the addition of php_ for windows
installs has not been universally applied. Extensions like eAccelerator,
adodb and other third party extensions that did not form part of the
windows 'installation' f
On 10/05/16 20:18, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> WIN: `php -d extension=php_foo.dll -d zend_extension=php_bar.dll`
I would be most surprised to find windows users running php command
line, but I suppose I am somewhat out of the loop on that side. All my
windows users run PHP on a web server and have troub
On 5/10/2016 9:01 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> The idea has been proposed before, but the addition of php_ for windows
> installs has not been universally applied. Extensions like eAccelerator,
> adodb and other third party extensions that did not form part of the
> windows 'installation' files. Most
On 10/05/16 17:27, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>> Please read and comment :
>> >
>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
>> >
> +1 and I am wondering why nobody else ever came to this idea.
The idea has been proposed before, but the addition of php_ for windows
installs has not been universally a
On 10/05/2016 17:54, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Please read and comment :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
The RFC says " it is currently impossible to write a single
configuration file that will work in both environments" - but even with
extension fix, wouldn't it be still impos
Hi,
Le 10/05/2016 à 18:54, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
The RFC says " it is currently impossible to write a single
configuration file that will work in both environments" - but even with
extension fix, wouldn't it be still impossible since Windows are Unix
paths would probably be different?
Y
On 5/10/2016 6:56 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/10/2016 6:54 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
Please read and comment :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
>>
>> The RFC says " it is currently impossible to write a single
>> configuration file that will work in both env
On 5/10/2016 6:54 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Please read and comment :
>>>
>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
>
> The RFC says " it is currently impossible to write a single
> configuration file that will work in both environments" - but even with
> extension fix, wouldn
Hi!
>> Please read and comment :
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
The RFC says " it is currently impossible to write a single
configuration file that will work in both environments" - but even with
extension fix, wouldn't it be still impossible since Windows are Unix
paths would pr
On 5/10/2016 3:22 PM, François Laupretre wrote:
> Please read and comment :
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/load-ext-by-name
>
+1 and I am wondering why nobody else ever came to this idea.
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
