Hi,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
>
> Another thing I would want to work on is making the openssl_pkcs7_*
> functions in memory instead of file based. This would increase the
> security concerns since that means it won't save plaintext temporarily to
> file.
>
> An at
On 06/04/17 at 08:02pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > On 06/04/17 at 07:00pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 06/04/17 at 07:00pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa
> wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and
> extending
> > > openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return
On 06/04/17 at 07:00pm, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and extending
> > openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return a PKCS7 structure. The reasoning for
> > the addition of these functions
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> I would like to propose the addition of openssl_pkcs7_read and extending
> openssl_pkcs7_verify to also return a PKCS7 structure. The reasoning for
> the addition of these functions is the requirement at work to obtain the
> CA certific
