On 05.07.22 11:38, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:37 AM Andreas Heigl wrote:
Hey all.
On 05.07.22 02:04, Peter Cowburn wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot
wrote:
Hi internals,
If the rest also thinks t
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:37 AM Andreas Heigl wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> On 05.07.22 02:04, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi internals,
> >>>
> >>> If the rest also thinks the RF
Hey Timon,
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 15:33, Timon de Groot wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Almost a year ago I first proposed my RFC draft to introduce a new
> json_encode parameter 'indent'. I have received a lot of feedback on the
> change, very insightful. The feedback can be boiled down to:
> - Acce
On 05.07.2022 09:37, Andreas Heigl wrote:
What I would have prefered is instead of a the new parameter $indent
having a numerical value to have a string value.
That would have allowed the following:
json_encode($data, indent: " ");
or
json_encode($data, indent: "\t");
That woul
Hey all.
On 05.07.22 02:04, Peter Cowburn wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot
wrote:
Hi internals,
If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
coming week.
As this is my first RFC, I'm not so s
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot
> wrote:
>
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
> > coming week.
> > As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets ki
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:38 AM Timon de Groot wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
> coming week.
> As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets kicked
> off, so I'd like to know what I need to do!
>
You just need
Hi
On 7/4/22 09:38, Timon de Groot wrote:
If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
coming week.
With the minimum voting period being 14 days as per
https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting and the feature freeze for PHP
8.2 being 2022-07-19 23:59:59 UTC as per
As a flag can't really hurt, I'm thinking of going with option B before
starting the vote.
Also agree with ignoring the indent parameter, as a tab character is
less dependent on how much it is repeated.
Kind regards,
Timon
On 04-07-2022 03:22, Kevin Israel wrote:
On 7/3/22 18:01, Jakub Zelen
Hi internals,
If the rest also thinks the RFC is good to go, I suggest we start a vote
coming week.
As this is my first RFC, I'm not so sure how this typically gets kicked
off, so I'd like to know what I need to do!
Kind regards,
Timon
On 04-07-2022 00:01, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
Hi,
On Fri,
On 7/3/22 18:01, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
I think we can put this RFC to the vote. If the author is to busy I would
like to start voting later this week. It would be a pity not to make it to
feature freeze as it is quite straight forward and the implementation seems
good as well so I guess we don't
Hi,
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Timon de Groot wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> Almost a year ago I first proposed my RFC draft to introduce a new
> json_encode parameter 'indent'. I have received a lot of feedback on the
> change, very insightful. The feedback can be boiled down to:
> - Accepting
12 matches
Mail list logo
