On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
> Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15).
>
As it's already July 18, I've closed the vote. The RFC has been accepted
(17:9) and the option "PascalCase except Acronyms" received more
2017-07-05 19:20 GMT+02:00 Fleshgrinder :
> Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense.
>
> What I want to avoid is that anybody thinks that the second poll has any
> meaning if the first one is a "no". In that case the second one is
> "nothing". That is basically the point. A vot
On 7/4/2017 11:24 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> Hmm, one might dislike having the coding standards amended in this
> regard, but still may have a preference on how it would be changed, if
> the change will be accepted.
>
Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense.
What I wan
On 04.07.2017 at 18:44, schrieb Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 7/1/2017 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>>
>> Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15).
>>
>
> Just to clarify something that came up:
>
> Voting "no" on the first poll means that we
On 7/1/2017 7:42 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
> Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15).
>
Just to clarify something that came up:
Voting "no" on the first poll means that we are not going to define a
rule for class naming. Hence, voting "
On 7/1/2017 9:13 PM, Pieter Hordijk wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc still says no RFCs are in voting.
>
>
Thanks, fixed.
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Original Message -
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming
>
> Voting starts now and will be open for two weeks (July 15).
>
> --
> Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
https://wiki.php.net/rfc still says no RFCs are in voting.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
