Hi Pavel,
On 4 October 2015 at 11:31, Pavel Kouřil wrote:
>
> and what about changing the empty ctor of Closure to
> __construct(callable $callable)?
>
> And the usage would be new Closure([$this, 'abc']);?
>
I'm going to change the RFC to use the 'named constructor'
Closure::fromCallable which
On 4 October 2015 at 10:16, Ben Scholzen 'DASPRiD' wrote:
>
> you could just do this:
>
> return function ($data) { return $this->genericValidation($data); }
>
> you could just do this:
>
> return function ($data) { return $this->genericValidation($data); }
Yes, there are workarounds possible th
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> As mentioned already by Andrea: why not just a named constructor on the
> closure class, like `Closure::fromCallable(callable $callable)`?
> Much simpler, easier to find, etc etc...
> On Sep 29, 2015 11:23, "Dan Ackroyd" wrote:
>
>> Hello in
As mentioned already by Andrea: why not just a named constructor on the
closure class, like `Closure::fromCallable(callable $callable)`?
Much simpler, easier to find, etc etc...
On Sep 29, 2015 11:23, "Dan Ackroyd" wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allo
On 29.09.2015 16:23, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
Hello internals,
I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
code.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
Thanks to Joe and Bob for the assistance in the
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Dan Ackroyd
wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
> code.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
>
> Thanks to Joe and Bo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
> code.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
>
> Thanks to Joe and Bob
On 29 September 2015 at 14:56, Peter Petermann wrote:
> why not just do "return function() { $this->myPrivateMethod(); };"
That would not work if there were any parameters to the function. Also
all other information would need to be duplicated e.g. the return
type.
> this should be easy enough t
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
>> +1, I'm not sure it belongs into ext/reflection, though?
On 29 September 2015 at 14:54, Joe Watkins wrote:
> +1 on the concept, I tried to argue it belongs in /Zend too ... still think
Sure I'll move it to there when I finish off the
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
> code.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
>
> Thanks to Joe and Bob
+1 on the concept, I tried to argue it belongs in /Zend too ... still think
it does ...
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Michael Wallner wrote:
> On 29/09/15 16:23, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> > Hello internals,
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> > created in
On 29/09/15 16:23, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hello internals,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion of a proposal to allow closures to be
> created in user-land without having to use a whole lot of reflection
> code.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable
>
> Thanks to Joe and Bob for the assi
12 matches
Mail list logo
