On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> One thing is to change from "single vote" to "approval voting" (one can
> "aaprove" any of those, sum up, done, one of the best voting systems for
> "winner takes it all" things
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_voting)
Multiple ch
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 14:25 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Whereas 50%-1 vote for "Two years, one normal fixes and one security
> > fixes only" and "With the PHP 5.5 final release"
> >
> > Then the winner will be "One year with security fixes only" and "With
> > the PHP 5.5 final release" which prob
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> Separating the two questions is "strange" and can lead to unintended
> results. They should be combined into one. Example assumption: 50%+1
> vote for "One year with security fixes only" but are split between "With
> the next PHP 5.3 rele
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 12:39 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Clint Priest wrote:
>
> > Would this 1 or 2 year period begin from release date of 5.3 or as of
> > around now/vote?
>
> See "When should start the EOL period and when should it be announced?"
I don't unde
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Kris Craig wrote:
>
> > Would a voting option to tie it to the release of a future PHP version,
> > rather than a fixed time interval, be appropriate?
>
>
> Like in end it when 5.x is released?
Actually, I wa
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Clint Priest wrote:
> Would this 1 or 2 year period begin from release date of 5.3 or as of around
> now/vote?
See "When should start the EOL period and when should it be announced?"
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
P
Would this 1 or 2 year period begin from release date of 5.3 or as of around
now/vote?
-Clint
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Kris Craig wrote:
>
>> Would a voting option to tie it to the release of a future PHP version,
>> rather than a fixe
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Kris Craig wrote:
> Would a voting option to tie it to the release of a future PHP version,
> rather than a fixed time interval, be appropriate?
Like in end it when 5.x is released? Not sure it helps in anyway, but
that's possible already if we choose to begin t
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> While the 5.3 RM already unilaterally published some announce about
> 5.3 status with the last release, we still have to clearly and openly
> decide what is the best road to take.
>
> Here is the last version of the rfc:
>
> https://wik
