Original Message-
> From: Christer Holgersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:24
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] PHP_FCGI_TIMEOUT
>
>
>
> Currently apache and lighttpd. Both are feasible to pat
Thursday, December 02, 2004 11:24
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] PHP_FCGI_TIMEOUT
>
>
>
> Currently apache and lighttpd. Both are feasible to patch,
> but I looked into adding this functionality to lighttpd, and
> that would requir
Currently apache and lighttpd. Both are feasible to patch, but
I looked into adding this functionality to lighttpd, and that
would require a more complicated patch than this, so this won ;-)
As you said, it is not the end of the world. I am quite happy to
patch PHP myself when needed, but thought
What front-end are you using? Look it's not the end of the world but you're
the first person who seems to have wanted this and I don't see dozens of
front-ends being patched to support this. I think it's quite esoteric and I
don't like seeing more and more patches, even if they don't do anything
Yes, it could be implemented that way too, but it would require
a patch to all the different front-ends you might be using instead
of one simple patch to the backend. You might also have a front-end
that you do not have the source for, and thus cannot patch.
I consider it a worthwhile patch. It
I must be missing something. Again, why shouldn't this be the job of
whatever is running the FastCGI stuff? So what if it's a web frontend? It
should be able to kill the mother implementation so that it also kills its
children.
At 08:27 AM 12/2/2004 +0100, Christer Holgersson wrote:
If you are
If you are running the FastCGI version of PHP it will start
up a number (default 8) of "child" PHP interpretors that will
wait around indefinitely for work to do, and the "mother" FastCGI
process will automatically restart any process that terminates
(and automatically restart every child after
I don't see why this patch is needed. It's the FastCGI implementation's job
to do the right thing and terminate the processes according to some kind of
strategy. The FCGI processes shouldn't self destruct.
Andi
At 07:11 PM 12/1/2004 +0100, Christer Holgersson wrote:
Included is a patch that adds
