On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> It could also easily be a step in the wrong direction if it isn't
> implemented carefully. Turning interchangeable scalar types into fake
> objects could introduce the equivalent of strong typing.
Indeed, that's not an easy thing to think
On 11/13/2011 10:08 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> 2011/11/13 Antoine Delignat-Lavaud :
>> So this means being able to use $string->strlen() (or even $string->len())
>> instead of strlen($string) or $array->in_array($x) ($array->in($x)) instead
>> of in_array($x,$array), right?
>
> Yes, that's the idea,
On 13.11.11 19:08, Pierre Joye wrote:
> 2011/11/13 Antoine Delignat-Lavaud :
>> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 14:23 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>>
>>> There is an idea to have pseudo object for common types, where these
>>> functions would be callable without actually having an instance. No
>>> implementati
2011/11/13 Antoine Delignat-Lavaud :
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 03:10 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
please use two replies next time :)
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 14:23 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>> There is an idea to have pseudo object for common types, where these
>> functions would be callable
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 03:10 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Your using is_equal_function, this does a == comparison. People will
stumble over $a = 0; $a in ["a", "b", "c", "it's easy as one two
three"]; which will be true. This is the consistent and correct
behaviour for the language but people w
2011/11/13 Johannes Schlüter :
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 03:10 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>> For 5.5 I also have doubts whether it's worth the additional keyword and
>> opcode. Yes it will, most likely, but this is an extension to the
>> grammar ...
>
> I meanwhile did a quick check on google co
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 03:10 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> For 5.5 I also have doubts whether it's worth the additional keyword and
> opcode. Yes it will, most likely, but this is an extension to the
> grammar ...
I meanwhile did a quick check on google codesearch. I found a few cases
where "in
Hi,
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 02:37 +0100, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud wrote:
>
> if(($v1=="a1" || $v=="a2" || ...) && ($v2=="b1" || $v2=="b2" ||...)
> && ...)
This could also be written as
if (in_array($v1, ["a1", "a2", ...]) && in_array($v2m ["b1", "b2", ...]))
> by replacing them with:
>
> if($v
