Antony Dovgal wrote:
>
> Ilia? Greg?
> Any comments?
>
> On 14.08.2007 15:42, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> This patch breaks PEAR phar install on 64bit.
>>> From what I can see in the source code, it compares data in the phar
>>> with
>> the result of sprintf("%u"..), which is different on 32bit and
I think the C behaviour is correct and we need to make a (hopefully)
slight adjustment to the pear installer code.
On 17-Aug-07, at 8:14 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
Ilia? Greg?
Any comments?
On 14.08.2007 15:42, Antony Dovgal wrote:
This patch breaks PEAR phar install on 64bit.
From what I c
Ilia? Greg?
Any comments?
On 14.08.2007 15:42, Antony Dovgal wrote:
This patch breaks PEAR phar install on 64bit.
From what I can see in the source code, it compares data in the phar with
the result of sprintf("%u"..), which is different on 32bit and 64bit because of
this patch.
Either phar
On 8/14/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This patch breaks PEAR phar install on 64bit.
> From what I can see in the source code, it compares data in the phar with
> the result of sprintf("%u"..), which is different on 32bit and 64bit because
> of this patch.
>
> Either phar should
