I know, I've just replied with an example to the "Such a performance
regression sounds like an appropriate "punishment" to me for deploying bad
code ;-)" statement.
btw:
http://www.tyrael.hu/2011/06/26/performance-of-error-handling-in-php/
http://www.tyrael.hu/2011/10/09/error-suppression-improvem
Unless you are deleting thousands of files in a tight loop, the
overhead involved won't make any difference for your application.
In general your application is throwing many errors, even "benign"
E_STRICT or E_NOTICE you are already incurring a performance hit.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:49 AM, F
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> On 10/16/11 5:54 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Such a performance regression sounds like an appropriate "punishment" to
>> me for deploying bad code ;-)
>>
>
> By bad code you mean not obsessively checking for stuff that is
Hi!
On 10/16/11 5:54 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Such a performance regression sounds like an appropriate "punishment" to
me for deploying bad code ;-)
By bad code you mean not obsessively checking for stuff that is of no
importance to them as programmers and is only required because
On 10/12/2011 07:59 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Note that on 99% of real PHP code, dozens of "errors" may happen due to
multitude of notices and E_STRICTs that we have now and we have no means
to disable until the very last moment before printing them.
Such a performance regression sounds like an
Hi!
do you think this is worth fixing (in 5.4 trunk)? (as zend_signal
was introduced, and this fix will cost litte perf).
OK, if it doesn't cost performance then I guess it's fine to apply it.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 2
2011/10/13 Kalle Sommer Nielsen :
> Hi
>
> 2011/10/13 Xinchen Hui :
>> Hi:
>> If send signal enabled, no system will be called.
>>
>> Thkans
>>
>
> What about systems without Zend Signal Handling, like Windows?
hmm, I have updated the patch, the fix only take affect when
ZEND_SIGNALS defined. :)
Hi
2011/10/13 Xinchen Hui :
> Hi:
> If send signal enabled, no system will be called.
>
> Thkans
>
What about systems without Zend Signal Handling, like Windows?
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http
s,send,zend,
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-10-13，8:16，Xinchen Hui 写道：
> Hi:
> If send signal enabled, no system will be called.
>
> Thkans
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> 在 2011-10-12，22:59，Stas Malyshev 写道：
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 10/12/11 7:50 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>> Seems like a fine solution, p
Hi:
If send signal enabled, no system will be called.
Thkans
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-10-12，22:59，Stas Malyshev 写道：
> Hi!
>
> On 10/12/11 7:50 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> Seems like a fine solution, performance loss would occur only when
>> error happens...
>
> Note that on 99% of real PH
Hi!
On 10/12/11 7:50 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Seems like a fine solution, performance loss would occur only when
error happens...
Note that on 99% of real PHP code, dozens of "errors" may happen due to
multitude of notices and E_STRICTs that we have now and we have no means
to disable unt
Seems like a fine solution, performance loss would occur only when
error happens...
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> I filed a bug about SIGALRM(or SIGPROF) has chance to cause
> segfault in php_error_cb. https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60038
>
> do you think this is
12 matches
Mail list logo
