RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace RFC

2008-09-04 Thread Catalin Zamfir Alexandru | KIT Software CAZ
ing real-life work. Don't make sacrifices just to keep the language simple. Just go "full throttle forward!" Regards, Catalin Z. Alexandru -Original Message----- From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 8:02 PM To: Marcus Boe

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace RFC

2008-09-02 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! My guess is that it allows for development with heavy __autload usage and then doing deployment based on static analysis where each target page results in one large php file generated from that analysis. So there won't be any overhead and each script target would be a single target of its ow

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace RFC

2008-09-02 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Stanislav, Tuesday, September 2, 2008, 9:51:38 AM, you wrote: > Hi! >> The problem is that the loading/unloading of the scanner and parser can >> be significant overhead, and by cramming all code into a single file, >> can result in a 10%-30% performance improvement over code in separate >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace RFC

2008-09-02 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! The problem is that the loading/unloading of the scanner and parser can be significant overhead, and by cramming all code into a single file, can result in a 10%-30% performance improvement over code in separate files, even with an opcode cache. This has been verified independently Not on

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: namespace RFC

2008-09-01 Thread Marcus Boerger
Hello Gregory, Sunday, August 31, 2008, 10:04:23 PM, you wrote: > Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> All the recent discussions about namespaces, have left many of us >> wondering if our implementation is rock solid or not. However the >> discussions were not really well organized. Thi