Can we just use PHP7 instead of PHPNG in the wiki, that might be misleading.
On 11 February 2015 at 01:03, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Xinchen Hui in php.internals (Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:49:43 +0800):
> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> >> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading
> [sni
Xinchen Hui in php.internals (Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:49:43 +0800):
>On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading
[snip]
>> ib_link = (ibase_db_link *)zend_fetch_resource2(Z_RES_P(link_arg),
>> link_id, LE_LINK, le_link, le_plink);
>>
>> But this is only a
> De : yohg...@gmail.com [mailto:yohg...@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo
> Ohgaki
>
> Basic stuff should be in source. IMO.
> Perhaps, we should use only the Wiki for additional internal stuff from now
> on.
+1. Documenting Zend API in docbook format is unrealistic. The whole ' PHP at
the Core' ch
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski wrote:
> I'm totally aware that those files are tend to be more up-to-date thanks
> to placing them directly where core developers work. However, we have wiki
> pages for internals stuff, so why not move it to the manual and provide
>
Hey:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf in php.internals (Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:28:37 -0500):
>>We have had quite a number of changes to the extension API and it
>>worries me a little bit how long it will take everyone to get their
>>extensions ported. We have UPGR
