I agree, the Unicode-enabled version of PHP should definitely be 6.0.
Zeev
At 11:41 09/08/2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
Now that we branched it's time to rename HEAD to something else than 5.1
in order to have different version numbers. Although the name PHP 5.5
was mentioned before, I do think w
Hello George,
Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 9:48:22 PM, you wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and aim
>> to release it before Perl 6 :)
>> From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might
>> actua
At 09:41 PM 8/9/2005 +0200, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:25:27 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote:
> I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and
> aim to release it before Perl 6 :)
> From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might
On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and aim
to release it before Perl 6 :)
From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might
actually be a realistic goal.
I think that's more than a 'might'.
George
--
P
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:25:27 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote:
> I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and
> aim to release it before Perl 6 :)
> From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might
> actually be a realistic goal.
No rush please... Bet
I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and aim to
release it before Perl 6 :)
From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might actually be
a realistic goal.
Andi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net
Quoting Weyert de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
I'm not sure what you guys are discussing here, but it's definitely
not up to any non-contributor to decide which version number we
pick. And making it dependable on whether some patch goes in or not
doesn't make sense at all.
Such a kind way
A minimum of respect does not cost anything. The author of this
patch invest a lot of time in it.
Oh well, one of the reasons why the patch for the parser won't be
available, no faster parser for PHP. Neither the other stuff I was
working on, will just use for in my own compiles.
A major
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Weyert de Boer wrote:
>
> > >6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 with Unicode
> > >only? ;)
> >
> > Namespaces patch is a patch so it's fine for version 5.5, if
> > you would ask me.
Hi
I'm not sure what you guys are discussing here, but it's definitely not
up to any non-contributor to decide which version number we pick. And
making it dependable on whether some patch goes in or not doesn't make
sense at all.
Such a kind way of response on your site, I won't even consid
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Weyert de Boer wrote:
> >6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 with Unicode only? ;)
>
> Namespaces patch is a patch so it's fine for version 5.5, if you would
> ask me. I would see the unicode support as a bigger step forward.
I'm not sure what you guys are discussing
liver.
- David
> -Original Message-
> From: Weyert de Boer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:55 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5 or 6.0
>
> Hi
>
> >6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 wit
Hi
6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 with Unicode only? ;)
Namespaces patch is a patch so it's fine for version 5.5, if you would
ask me.
I would see the unicode support as a bigger step forward.
--
Yours,
Weyert de Boer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
innerfuse*
http://www.innerfuse.biz/
6.0 if the Namespaces patch makes it in, 5.5 with Unicode only? ;)
- David
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 10:41 AM
> To: PHP Developers Mailing List
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5 or 6.0
>
> Now that we branched it's
Derick Rethans schrieb:
> I do think we should call it PHP 6.0
+1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visi
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Derick Rethans wrote:
Now that we branched it's time to rename HEAD to something else than 5.1
in order to have different version numbers. Although the name PHP 5.5
was mentioned before, I do think we should call it PHP 6.0. As the
Unicode support is quite a drastic change. G
16 matches
Mail list logo
