Hello Markus,
the question alone makes me question if it was worth the effort starting
it :-)
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 11:23:32 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there an "UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2"? I think there it would make sense, too.
- - Markus
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
>
>
> On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
>
>> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>>> S
Cool. I just had a horrible vision of hundreds of reports of 'strange
crashes' :)
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets translated
to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what h
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets
translated to an E_ERROR "Catchable fatal error...".
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people
don't have E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on?
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people don't have
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on? Does it fall back to
E_ERROR or does the code fail silently?
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ili
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater
then it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this
affect a few days ago (Thanks!).
This need
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater then
it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this affect a few
days ago (Thanks!).
This needs to be made obvious in the release notes or something. Users
that set their error level in apache
At 12:23 17/05/2006, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into
Hello Richard,
well my mail was a bit out of context or at the wrong reply to Sebastian.
He was talking about issues with callin static functions with bypassing
$this as a parameter
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 12:22:36 AM, you wrote:
>>> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Addit
>> Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
foo::$bar = 1;
On Wed, May 17, 2006 2:03 pm, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around
> the
> fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a nor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I'd say E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR has to go into E_ALL as it was effectively
there previously, as part of E_ERROR. So +1 there.
As far as E
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-0.5
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar =
> 1;
+1
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On 5/17/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1 for E_RECOVERABLE_
Hello Sebastian,
there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around the
fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a normal variable (remember
the examples give on this list included that). Right now $this is handled by
a special zval not stored in the local or global symo
At 04:26 PM 5/16/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic st
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and
> forth flaming going around and we need to finally come to a
> decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
> fo
On 17-May-06, at 2:10 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I do
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR's apparently going in anyway.
E_STRICT, I'd be all for including into E_ALL now if it weren't for the
'semi-statics' issue (complex) and the dist
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I am not glad with E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR at all, but if it went into 5.2 it
should be included into E_ALL, becouse in most cases it substitute E_ERROR
messages.
E_STRICT +0
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR +1
> Addition of support for dynamic statics
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Changing the behavior of error reporting can have some implications on
servers where it is intended to not show errors at least with E_STRICT
errors.
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynam
Am Mi, den 17.05.2006 schrieb Ilia Alshanetsky um 1:26:
-1 for E_STRICT in 5.x
/Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
>
> -1
Apparently I had the wrong context when I read a posting by Marcus on
technical issues (slowdown).
If there are no technical issues with implementing this, then I am -0
on this.
--
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
> flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
> Addition o
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+0
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E
On 17.05.2006 03:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE should stay.
E_STR
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I don't like E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE suddenly starting to th
On 17.5.2006 1:26 Uhr, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
> flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1, especially for in
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Brian Moon
-
http://dealnews.com/
Its good to be cheap =)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: h
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth flaming
> going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
>
> The two topics are:
>
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR shou
On 5/16/06, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1.
--Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.p
-1 on both here, E_STRICT can wait and dynamic static variables are
pretty pointless, the workaround is clearer than the kludge..
StaticClass::$options['somekey'] = 'value';
Regards
Alan
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going
On 16-May-06, at 7:50 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
While doing all the stuff we wanted for 5.2 we also added
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR. This includes stuff that was E_ERROR before
Hello Ilia,
second try of second part this time using static. I guess i need sleep.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
> Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
If we go that road i suggest we simply drop support for STATIC. Fixing
the issues
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
> Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
I gave my best on this. But be sure. I'll just ignore any whining on
any change that has a E_STRICT in older versions when doing changes
in any version after 5.2.
Also befor
So, would that make it - non cents?
...sorry, couldn't resist
-D
On May 16, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So please throw in your +1/-1
Darrell Brogdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://darrell.brogdon.net
http://phpflashcards.com
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
+1
Edin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
38 matches
Mail list logo
