Hi
Am 2025-03-20 17:09, schrieb Gina P. Banyard:
And another user [2] was basically suggesting my previous solution of
adding support for type classes/runtime implementation of interfaces.
[…]
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/1jbcbtx/comment/mhvxo5j/
I don't see how this could (usefu
On Saturday, 15 March 2025 at 09:23, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> On 2025-03-14 10:09, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’ve opened the vote on the Optional interfaces RFC.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
>>
>> Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17288
>
Hello,
The voting has concluded with 15 votes in favor and 19 against. As such, the
RFC has been declined.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
Thank you all for taking the time to consider the proposal and casting your
votes. I'm especially grateful to those who helped refine t
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:12 AM Juris Evertovskis wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’ve opened the vote on the Optional interfaces RFC.
>
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
>
>
>
> Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17288
>
> Discussion: https://externals.io/message/12618
On 3/14/25 03:09, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
Hello,
I've opened the vote on the Optional interfaces RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17288
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/126185
The voting will be closed on 2025-03-2
On 2025-03-20 18:09, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
And another user [2] was basically suggesting my previous solution of
adding support for type classes/runtime implementation of interfaces.
Hey,
There are two ideas -- the `$object implements Iface` that you suggested
and the `SomeClass implements
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 11:09 AM, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> Frankly, the comment from u\phuncky [1] mentioning the possibility of
> bad interactions with default interface methods (something I think is
> more important than this) is reinforcing my opinion that this RFC solve
> the problem in a
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025, 11:25 Juris Evertovskis wrote:
> The key point, hoewever, seems to be that the naming of the feature is
> excremental and very easy to misunderstand. I suppose the naming issue can
> be solved separately (if a better name is found) and the documentation can
> use a different
Hi,
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
>
I voted yes as we have got a specific use case in core - user stream
wrapper. More details can be found in
https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/10506 .
Regards
Jakub
On 2025-03-14 10:09, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
Hello,
I've opened the vote on the Optional interfaces RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
Implementation: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/17288
Discussion: https://externals.io/message/126185
The voting will be closed on 2025-
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:52 AM Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optional-interfaces
>>
>
> I voted yes as we have got a specific use case in core - user stream
> wrapper. More details can be found in
> https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/10506 .
>
>
Ah I should have pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
