On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Dmitri Snytkine <
dsnytk...@ultralogistics.com> wrote:
> Odd how substring can be used as index of string.
oh, I see where the confusion comes from.
the reason why "foobar"["foo"] returns 'f' isn't that "foo" is a substring
of "foobar", but that "foo" will be cas
-
From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 8:24 AM
To: Dmitri Snytkine
Cc: Laruence; Pierre Joye; Patrick ALLAERT; Nikita Popov; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string dereference
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:15
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dmitri Snytkine <
dsnytk...@ultralogistics.com> wrote:
> No sure who can and cannot vote, I don't see any way for me to vote.
>
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting
currently the following two groups can vote:
- people having php.net svn account
- people having a wiki
vider in 2011"
-Original Message-
From: larue...@gmail.com [mailto:larue...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Laruence
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 9:36 PM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Patrick ALLAERT; Nikita Popov; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Call for voting about const array/string d
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> Hi:
>> I have reset the vote, only vote for trunk now.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference
>>
>
> What happens in your patch if something like ['foo', 'bar'][1] is used in
> write context?
>
this patch will not al
Hi!
Hi:
I have reset the vote, only vote for trunk now.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference
What happens in your patch if something like ['foo', 'bar'][1] is used
in write context?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext
Hi:
I have reset the vote, only vote for trunk now.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference
thanks
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> post again as a top thread with this point being clarified please :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Tue,
post again as a top thread with this point being clarified please :)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov :
This can't go into PHP 5
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov :
>>> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
>>> addition and the release is already in RC.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> @Laruence
>> Can you re
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov :
>>> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
>>> addition and the release is already in RC.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> @Laruence
>> Can you re
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> 2011/12/13 Nikita Popov :
>> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
>> addition and the release is already in RC.
>
> +1
>
> @Laruence
> Can you remove the voting widget?
I would reset the vote and make the vote
2011/12/13 Nikita Popov :
> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
> addition and the release is already in RC.
+1
@Laruence
Can you remove the voting widget?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> Call for voting about the const array/string derefernce RFC now.
>
> you can find more info here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constdereference#vote
I have always wondered why array dereference does not just work on
arbitrary expressions in PHP like other operators do. Even with the
latest modifi
Hi:
thanks for pointing this out.
yes, maybe 5.4.1
thanks
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
> addition and the release is already in RC.
>
> Nikita
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Laruence wrote:
>>
Hi:
should consistent with :
wrote:
>>
>> echo "foobar"["foo"][0];
>
>
> "foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"?
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
>> addition and the release is already in RC.
Hi all,
On Tue Dec 13 09:32:43 2011, Morfi wrote:
echo "foobar"["foo"][0];
"foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"?
Exactly. The index/key "foo" does not really exist in the string
"foobar" because a string is more an indexed array of characters than a
combination of substrings (as the
>
> echo "foobar"["foo"][0];
"foobar"["foo"] - Why not "undefined index"?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
> addition and the release is already in RC.
>
> Nikita
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Laruen
This can't go into PHP 5.4.0 in any case, because it is a feature
addition and the release is already in RC.
Nikita
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> Call for voting about the const array/string derefernce RFC now.
>
> you can find more info here: https://wiki.php.ne
18 matches
Mail list logo
