I don't think that's a good idea. There are already production systems that
call it like \Sodium::function_here().
I'm not an extension developer; I don't know what level of effort would
even be required to refactor it from a class with static methods to a
namespace with functions.
And when you c
On 21/05/15 09:49, Peter Petermann wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I personally think the RFC is a bit short,
> also I just had a very brief look at the documentation of the
extension in
> question, and find its API a bit strange,
> whats up with having everything in static method calls?
>
> regards,
> PP
>
Hi Scott,
I personally think the RFC is a bit short,
also I just had a very brief look at the documentation of the extension in
question, and find its API a bit strange,
whats up with having everything in static method calls?
regards,
PP
2015-05-21 3:15 GMT+02:00 Scott Arciszewski :
> Hi Inter
