It's been about 3 days since the last comment on the patch itself on
this thread and nearly a week since the patch was submitted for
comment.
Until a patch is committed, I can't publish a patch for the GC, and
until that's published, there's really nothing to debate about yet. :)
I can't commit a
On 9/8/07, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yes, if it turns out
> to be 10% slower, a lot of sites are going to want to run without it.
Sad, I see you have lost the notion about who are the vast mayority of
your users.
Facebook or any top site that requires extreme performance rep
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 08.09.2007 21:31, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> Facebook is quite active in APC development.
>
> I'm glad for APC, but this is a separate project (or a sub-project, whatever).
>
>> And yes, if it turns out to be 10% slower, a lot of sites are going to want
>> to run withou
On 08.09.2007 21:31, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Uhm I didn't mean to make this about one company or another (it was just an
> example,
> and btw, I think they've contributed to APC :) and this discussion is going
> very much
> of track. I guess you either didn't understand what I was saying or don't
On 08.09.2007 21:31, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Facebook is quite active in APC development.
I'm glad for APC, but this is a separate project (or a sub-project, whatever).
> And yes, if it turns out to be 10% slower, a lot of sites are going to want
> to run without it.
Right, but saying that we
Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 08.09.2007 19:34, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> When we all get a copy of the patch and get a chance to test it seriously
>> we'll know more.
>> I'm all in favor of having GC and very enthusiastic about this coming about
>> but I doubt you can
>> call it well enough tested. Wh
#x27;re running on empty...
Andi
> -Original Message-
> From: Antony Dovgal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 9:32 AM
> To: Andi Gutmans
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: FW: [PHP-DEV] Patch for macros for tracking refcount and
> is_
On 08.09.2007 19:34, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> When we all get a copy of the patch and get a chance to test it seriously
> we'll know more.
> I'm all in favor of having GC and very enthusiastic about this coming about
> but I doubt you can
> call it well enough tested. When we made memory manager ch
When we all get a copy of the patch and get a chance to test it seriously we'll
know more.
I'm all in favor of having GC and very enthusiastic about this coming about but
I doubt you can call it well enough tested. When we made memory manager changes
in the past there were bugs which were only f
