On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > Maybe John has to make this methods static and they will work just like
> the
> > functions.
As I just e-mailed Nuno, that's exactly what theyt should be (static
methods). I've been away from e-mail for the past for days because of my
move to NYC, but
Quoting Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Maybe John has to make this methods static and they will work just like
> the
> > functions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andrey
>
>
> Thats a good idea! But as we already have the non-OO function, I don't know
> if it worth to create the static methods.
> Nuno
> Maybe John has to make this methods static and they will work just like
the
> functions.
>
> Regards,
> Andrey
Thats a good idea! But as we already have the non-OO function, I don't know
if it worth to create the static methods.
Nuno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hello,
Today I was finishing writing the tidy docs and I've noted that the
functions $tidy->repairString() and $tidy->repairFile() simply don't work!
And I think these functions should be removed. I'll explain:
non-OO way:
OO way:
repairString($html));
echo $html;
?>
The non-OO w
Hello,
Today I was finishing writing the tidy docs and I've noted that the
functions $tidy->repairString() and $tidy->repairFile() simply don't work!
And I think these functions should be removed. I'll explain:
non-OO way:
OO way:
repairString($html));
echo $html;
?>
The non-OO way is very si
