Pierre wrote:
On a related note: Imo for users the real problems are different
extensions, which we won't enable by default (due to their dependency on
external stuff) and which might be available on some host or different
php.ini settings. For instance I was once annoyed by zlib not being
availa
On Tue, January 1, 2008 11:02 am, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Hello Johannes,
>>
>> I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in
>> always
>> like ext/standard?
-1
I still don't want SPL cluttering things up for me,
On Jan 1, 2008 6:02 PM, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > Hello Johannes,
> >
> > I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in
> > always
> > like ext/standard?
>
> First some statistics: Accord
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Johannes,
>
> I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in
> always
> like ext/standard?
First some statistics: According to my numbers[1], which are as wrong as
most other statistics about such stuff. 1%
On Dec 31, 2007 6:06 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > Hello Johannes,
> >
> > I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always
> > like ext/standard?
>
> +1
>
>
Finally...
+1
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Johannes,
>
> I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always
> like ext/standard?
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Johannes,
I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always
like ext/standard?
marcus
Monday, December 31, 2007, 7:31:40 PM, you wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 6:58 PM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>> SPL simply allows two things:
>> a
On Dec 30, 2007 6:58 PM, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> SPL simply allows two things:
> a) a stack that hooks into __autoload
> b) a default implementation that may be used (with ot without the former)
>
> We try to group functionality into extensions where we seem
Hello Andrew,
SPL simply allows two things:
a) a stack that hooks into __autoload
b) a default implementation that may be used (with ot without the former)
We try to group functionality into extensions where we seem fit. And by the
time I implemented spl_autoload stuff it made sense to put it i
Thanks for your replies guys.
Part of the reason why I asked here is because of a previous posting a
while back where Stas seemed to suggest that the spl_autoloader was
superior but from reading the api i didn't know if this was purely
from a flexibility point of view or if there was more too it.
On Dec 28, 2007 3:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Andrew Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
> > the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
> >
>
> Please use php-general for that kind of
On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Andrew Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
> the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
>
Please use php-general for that kind of question.
>
> kind regards
> Andrew
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PH
Andrew Mason schrieb:
> Hi guys,
> Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
> the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
You can only register one __autoload() function, whereas spl_autoload()
allows for a hierarchy of handlers. This allows for libraries to
register thei
On 12/28/07, Andrew Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
> the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
sure.
spl_autoload allows you to have many independent autoloaders
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/
--
PHP I
Hi guys,
Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over
the standard __autoload ? is there any ?
kind regards
Andrew
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
15 matches
Mail list logo
