Em Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:15:38 +0100, Pierre Joye
escreveu:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Gustavo Lopes
wrote:
Em Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:00:25 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs
escreveu:
Could we get a list of the BC breaks?
It would be required to get together eventually as we have to write
the 5.3->
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> Em Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:00:25 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs
> escreveu:
>
>> Could we get a list of the BC breaks?
>> It would be required to get together eventually as we have to write
>> the 5.3->5.4 migration guide as we did in the past for the pre
Em Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:00:25 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs
escreveu:
Could we get a list of the BC breaks?
It would be required to get together eventually as we have to write
the 5.3->5.4 migration guide as we did in the past for the previous
versions.
You can parse UPGRADING (
http://lxr.php.net
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:57 PM, JJ wrote:
>
>> While looking over the release notes for 5.4a1
>> (http://www.php.net/archive/2011.php#id2011-06-28-1) I noticed that
>> the related session_* functions had been removed.
>>
>> As I interpreted it,
On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:57 PM, JJ wrote:
> While looking over the release notes for 5.4a1
> (http://www.php.net/archive/2011.php#id2011-06-28-1) I noticed that
> the related session_* functions had been removed.
>
> As I interpreted it, this goes against the spirit of the release RFC
> for x.y+1.z
While looking over the release notes for 5.4a1
(http://www.php.net/archive/2011.php#id2011-06-28-1) I noticed that
the related session_* functions had been removed.
As I interpreted it, this goes against the spirit of the release RFC
for x.y+1.z releases, specifically:
- Backward compatibility mu
