On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
> > IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
> >
> > Why not to 5.0?
>
> 5.0 is dead? :)
5.1 is released? :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubs
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
>
> Why not to 5.0?
5.0 is dead? :)
Derick
--
Derick Rethans
http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/
IA>>It was MFHed to 5.1
Why not to 5.0?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It was MFHed to 5.1
Ilia
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Is there any reson why this patch:
>
> http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/php_incomplete_class.h?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u
>
>
> wasn't MFH'ed to older branches? I.e., was it done intentionally or it
> was just an omission?
--
PHP
Is there any reson why this patch:
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/ext/standard/php_incomplete_class.h?r1=1.15&r2=1.16&ty=u
wasn't MFH'ed to older branches? I.e., was it done intentionally or it was
just an omission?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://w
