Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-25 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
On my machine i get these results: Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) Windows has very slow filesystem layer (compared to Linux), unfortunately. Which means things that do more filesystem (like require_once that should resolve file pathes) are slower. Realpath cache should make it better to a measure. Any

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow thats fast! On my machine i get these results: Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) require_once - 1.7735 sec myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec I made two benchmarks one with relative paths and one with full paths. The full paths: Here the benchmarks with relative paths: Ubuntu

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Tijnema !
On 4/24/07, Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 04/24/2007 02:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wow thats fast! > > On my machine i get these results: > Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) > > require_once - 1.7735 sec > myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec > > > is that with the sources i just send? Yes, of c

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 04/24/2007 02:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow thats fast! On my machine i get these results: Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) require_once - 1.7735 sec myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec is that with the sources i just send? Yes, of course. But I'm using Linux, not windows. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal -

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Derick Rethans
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wow thats fast! > > On my machine i get these results: > Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) You use windows, you lose... Don't think that any sort of benchmarking on Windows makes sense... regards, Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 04/24/2007 03:01 PM, Marco Tabini wrote: On 24-Apr-07, at 7:00 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote: Yes, of course. But I'm using Linux, not windows. Maybe you're even using a machine that is more powerful than his... Maybe. But I doubt that powerful machines execute internal functions faster than

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Marco Tabini
On 24-Apr-07, at 7:00 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote: Yes, of course. But I'm using Linux, not windows. Maybe you're even using a machine that is more powerful than his... Mt. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow thats fast! On my machine i get these results: Win32 (PHP 5.2.1 CLI) require_once - 1.7735 sec myrequire_once - 1.0973 sec is that with the sources i just send? Am 24.04.2007, 12:10 Uhr, schrieb Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 04/24/2007 01:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello e

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 04/24/2007 01:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, when testing speed of includes and requires i found that "require_once" seems to be very slow in comparison to "require". Even worse "require_once" seems to be slower than a php function "myrequire_once". This is true not onl

Re: [PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread David Sklar
require_once verifies (via stat()) each path component in the path being loaded so that it can canonicalize it to check it against the canonicalized list of already-required files. Run your script below under strace and you will see all of those stats gumming up the works. Note also that if you

[PHP-DEV] require_once

2007-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone, when testing speed of includes and requires i found that "require_once" seems to be very slow in comparison to "require". Even worse "require_once" seems to be slower than a php function "myrequire_once". This is true not only for cli but also when using apc or eAccelerator.