On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 10/8/11 3:07 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
>> (string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
>
> Reserving primitive types was decided not to be practically implementabl
thanks for the heads up, I didn't remembered that thread :(
btw. didn't we had some parser improvement patch laying around for a while now?
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> 2011/10/8 Ferenc Kovacs :
>> Hi
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
>> I've just noticed that
Hi!
On 10/8/11 3:07 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
(string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
Reserving primitive types was decided not to be practically
implementable. As for reserving namespace PHP, this was supposed to be
documen
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> The votes made on that topic where mostly done by people who obviously
> haven't take care of the technical limitations nor having followed the
> BC problems it generates.
> That topic shouldn't have been voted at all.
It was voted on the
2011/10/8 Ferenc Kovacs :
> Hi
>
> https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
> I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
> (string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
> the primitive types didn't had the 66% of the votes, but the php
> namespace did, so at least that should have b
Hi
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
(string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
the primitive types didn't had the 66% of the votes, but the php
namespace did, so at least that should have been reserved in 5.4
already.
what is th
