On 9 September 2014 21:16, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Why is there no big/little-endian signed long long?
>
I suppose you could argue that these count
i - signed integer (machine dependent size and byte order)
I - unsigned integer (machine dependent size and byte order)
However they specify machi
On 9 September 2014 21:16, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Why is there no big/little-endian signed long long?
>
Because there is no big/little-endian signed long :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 9 Sep 2014, at 19:36, Leigh wrote:
> Hi Internals,
>
> I would like to propose giving pack() and unpack() 64 bit format
> codes, mimicking the current behaviour of 32 bit format codes.
What would this do on 32-bit platforms?
> Pack and unpack are obviously functions inspired by Perl, which
Hi Internals,
I would like to propose giving pack() and unpack() 64 bit format
codes, mimicking the current behaviour of 32 bit format codes.
Pack and unpack are obviously functions inspired by Perl, which has
the 64 bit format codes 'q' and 'Q'. So the first half of my proposal
is to give pack()
