Heh, I think given that we have 5.3 out there (with the code) there is little
reason to introduce new features into a bug fix release which is 5.2.
On 2009-11-24, at 4:51 PM, Rob Richards wrote:
> If I had only checked... Appears its been in trunk (and 5_3) for over 2 years
> now :)
>
> Rob
>
If I had only checked... Appears its been in trunk (and 5_3) for over 2
years now :)
Rob
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Seems like a no-brainer for 5.3 and trunk. You will have to discuss
with Ilia for 5.2. It seems a bit late in the game for that branch to
get this.
-Rasmus
Rob Richards wrote:
Seems like a no-brainer for 5.3 and trunk. You will have to discuss
with Ilia for 5.2. It seems a bit late in the game for that branch to
get this.
-Rasmus
Rob Richards wrote:
> The openssl extension is way to restrictive in the algorithms it
> supports, i.e. no support for SHA265 which is star
The openssl extension is way to restrictive in the algorithms it
supports, i.e. no support for SHA265 which is starting to become the
standard algo to use, etc.. Rather than having to always add more
constants and additional logic for any new algorithms, I'd like to
change the sign and verify f
