Hello Jani,
Tuesday, September 20, 2005, 11:19:28 AM, you wrote:
> No way.
Yep no way! PHP doesn't offer a '...' signature so we need it the way it is.
And i don't think we want to have those '...' signatures.
marcus
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although this
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although this is not as hot as references or Unicode stuff, I would like to
> discuss a new topic.
> Currently PHP accepts more parameters to a function than the required.
> In English:
> function a($b) {}
> a(1,2,3);
> ?>
>
> PHP accepts this an
No way.
--Jani
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi,
Although this is not as hot as references or Unicode stuff, I would like to
discuss a new topic.
Currently PHP accepts more parameters to a function than the required.
In English:
PHP accepts this and generates no errors
Nuno Lopes wrote:
PHP accepts this and generates no errors. My purpose is to start
generating an E_NOTICE, just like we do for not yet initialized
variables.
No, stupid output!
Generating E_NOTICE is not a good idea. You don't need to create functions
with variable arguments count like pr
Nuno Lopes wrote:
PHP accepts this and generates no errors. My purpose is to start
generating an E_NOTICE, just like we do for not yet initialized variables.
No, stupid output!
Generating E_NOTICE is not a good idea. You don't need to create
functions with variable arguments count like pri
Hi,
Although this is not as hot as references or Unicode stuff, I would like to
discuss a new topic.
Currently PHP accepts more parameters to a function than the required.
In English:
PHP accepts this and generates no errors. My purpose is to start generating
an E_NOTICE, just like we do for
