alex black wrote:
> Are there any plans to support packages / modules properly?
There is "Yet Another RfC for Namespace" [1] that I wrote almost a year
ago. Timm did a preliminary implementation based on the above design but
we came to the conclusion to postpone the discussion / inclusion un
hi all,
I wanted to forward this message along, and also ask some questions:
-Are there any plans to support packages / modules properly? (ala python,
which looks very nice, or I suppose java, etc).
-Are there plans to restore support for namespaces? The current PEAR method
of naming classes is
