On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Are there any objections if I disable E_DEPRECATED notice in dl() for FPM
> SAPI?
> The notice is already disabled for CGI/FastCGI, CLI and Embed SAPIs.
> I believe there's no reason for this notice in case of FPM, too.
IMO, it should be disabled in fa
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:00 +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 09:19 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> > I think it can be quite dangerous if you have extensions living shorter
> > than the PHP process. Not only might dlclose() cause some leaks but
> > there are a few extensions playing with
On 01/17/2011 09:19 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> I think it can be quite dangerous if you have extensions living shorter
> than the PHP process. Not only might dlclose() cause some leaks but
> there are a few extensions playing with function pointers or opcode
> handlers which aren't properly res
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:15 +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Are there any objections if I disable E_DEPRECATED notice in dl() for FPM
> SAPI?
> The notice is already disabled for CGI/FastCGI, CLI and Embed SAPIs.
> I believe there's no reason for this notice in case of FPM, too.
>
> Pa
Hi all!
Are there any objections if I disable E_DEPRECATED notice in dl() for FPM SAPI?
The notice is already disabled for CGI/FastCGI, CLI and Embed SAPIs.
I believe there's no reason for this notice in case of FPM, too.
Patch: http://dev.daylessday.org/diff/fpm_dl_notice.diff
--
Wbr,
Antony D