On Tuesday 24 June 2003 23:28, Tim Parkin wrote:
> I would just like to know what the arguments regarding the bundling of
> postgres are.
a) the Library has to be bundled too
b) Postgres doesn't run/compile on all platforms (e.g. Windows)
Regards
Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm
Zeev and Derick said
> Lots of sane comments
Thanks very much for the quick replies... I think the way forward for
most people will
be to accept that cheap shared hosting environments are only suitable
for basic
web solutions. Virtual hosting is 'very' cheap now and if someone wants
a (more
compl
At 11:56 25/06/2003, Tim Parkin wrote:
>At 00:20 25/06/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
>>That discussion is mostly non public and will not become public until
we can
>>find a consensus/solution togeter with MySQL on LinuxTag during july.
>
>That implies that this discussion exists; It doesn't; We're n
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Tim Parkin wrote:
> 1) Will MySQL be included again - I presume this will probably be so,
> dependant on MySQL AB.
No, we will not re-bundle the client libraries anymore. (Even if they
have a good exception we can not bundle GPL'ed libraries).
> 2) Will any consideration of
>At 00:20 25/06/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
>>That discussion is mostly non public and will not become public until
we can
>>find a consensus/solution togeter with MySQL on LinuxTag during july.
>
>That implies that this discussion exists; It doesn't; We're not
>discussing the addition of Postgre
At 00:20 25/06/2003, Marcus Börger wrote:
TP> Zeev,
TP> Could you please point me to the recent discussion that takes into
TP> account the progress of Postgres and the change in licensing of MySQL
That discussion is mostly non public and will not become public until we can
find a consensus/solutio
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Tim Parkin wrote:
>> Could you please point me to the recent discussion that takes into
>> account the progress of Postgres and the change in licensing of MySQL
>
>There isn't a discussion on that topic per say, but there are plenty on
>why we do(n't) want to bundle new option
Hello Tim,
Tuesday, June 24, 2003, 10:55:07 PM, you wrote:
>> I suggest we don't open this discussion again. The archives are full
TP> of
>> past discussions. We'll continue with the status-quo barring major,
TP> tiring
>> discussions to change it.
TP> Zeev,
TP> Could you please point me t
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Tim Parkin wrote:
> Could you please point me to the recent discussion that takes into
> account the progress of Postgres and the change in licensing of MySQL
There isn't a discussion on that topic per say, but there are plenty on
why we do(n't) want to bundle new options wit
> I suggest we don't open this discussion again. The archives are full
of
> past discussions. We'll continue with the status-quo barring major,
tiring
> discussions to change it.
Zeev,
Could you please point me to the recent discussion that takes into
account the progress of Postgres and the
I suggest we don't open this discussion again. The archives are full of
past discussions. We'll continue with the status-quo barring major, tiring
discussions to change it.
Zeev
At 09:50 24/06/2003, James Cox wrote:
>
> Since there's been a lot of talk about disabling mysql by
> default (and
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Chris wrote:
> Since there's been a lot of talk about disabling mysql by default (and
> having another option available), the PostgreSQL people are pretty excited
> about this and are keen to see what can be done about getting postgres
> enabled by default instead.
>
> Wha
>
> Since there's been a lot of talk about disabling mysql by
> default (and
> having another option available), the PostgreSQL people are
> pretty excited
> about this and are keen to see what can be done about getting
> postgres
> enabled by default instead.
>
I certainly don't speak fo
All,
Since there's been a lot of talk about disabling mysql by default (and
having another option available), the PostgreSQL people are pretty excited
about this and are keen to see what can be done about getting postgres
enabled by default instead.
What do people think about this?
How can we
14 matches
Mail list logo
