Please remember that now is just impossible to use AES-GCM with the current
OpenSSL extension API, there is no way to get/set the authentication tag.
With AES-GCM you already get a MAC for free, that should be the default
operation mode.
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67304
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 2/26/15, 11:07 AM, "Stefan Esser" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> libgcrypt does at least have a maintainer but it's poor
> >> Werner Koch who is so destitute he lives on charity raised
> >> on Kickstarter and has his work cut out just trying to
On 2/26/15, 11:17 AM, "Anthony Ferrara" wrote:
>One thing I'd like to make clear: I do not intend to target 7 with
>this functionality (possibly 7.1 or later). I'd rather build a POC and
>play with it for a bit. So while I do want to discuss it, I just
>wanted to set expectations properly.
Agree
On 2/26/15, 11:07 AM, "Stefan Esser" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> libgcrypt does at least have a maintainer but it's poor
>> Werner Koch who is so destitute he lives on charity raised
>> on Kickstarter and has his work cut out just trying to deal
>> with GPG: http://is.gd/cbHCYO
>
>Wow. Just WOW.
>
>Are you
Leigh and all,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Leigh wrote:
> On 26 February 2015 at 15:37, Tom Worster wrote:
>> On 2/26/15, 3:48 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote:
>>
>>>The custom is that the first word names the function group (yes, I know
>>>old functions do not follow it, but this is new o
On 26 February 2015 at 16:07, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> libgcrypt does at least have a maintainer but it's poor
>> Werner Koch who is so destitute he lives on charity raised
>> on Kickstarter and has his work cut out just trying to deal
>> with GPG: http://is.gd/cbHCYO
>
> Wow. Just WOW.
>
>
On 26 February 2015 at 15:37, Tom Worster wrote:
> On 2/26/15, 3:48 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote:
>
>>The custom is that the first word names the function group (yes, I know
>>old functions do not follow it, but this is new one). Unless we're going
>>to introduce a group of functions called sec
Hi,
> libgcrypt does at least have a maintainer but it's poor
> Werner Koch who is so destitute he lives on charity raised
> on Kickstarter and has his work cut out just trying to deal
> with GPG: http://is.gd/cbHCYO
Wow. Just WOW.
Are you jealous that thousands of people consider Werner Koch's
On 2/26/15, 3:48 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote:
>The custom is that the first word names the function group (yes, I know
>old functions do not follow it, but this is new one). Unless we're going
>to introduce a group of functions called secure_*, random_* is a natural
>choice.
This reminds me o
