Hi!
> The idea of the fix is fine (I didn't check all the related changes in
> PHP extensions).
> I think it must be included into 5.5.
Thanks for reviewing it! If I don't head any objections in next couple
of days, I'll merge it to 5.5.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http:
Hi Stas,
The idea of the fix is fine (I didn't check all the related changes in PHP
extensions).
I think it must be included into 5.5.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've created a pull to fix bug 49348 - when undefined properties do not
> produc
Hi Stas,
I'll take a look tomorrow or after tomorrow.
Sorry, quite busy.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've created a pull to fix bug 49348 - when undefined properties do not
> produce a notice when doing something like $this->undefined++, unlik
> I've created a pull to fix bug 49348 - when undefined properties do not
> produce a notice when doing something like $this->undefined++, unlike
> regular variables that do.
I've been bitten by this from time to time. A notice would have been nice.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mai
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've created a pull to fix bug 49348 - when undefined properties do not
> produce a notice when doing something like $this->undefined++, unlike
> regular variables that do.
>
> Unfortunately, this fix seems to require changing signatu
Hi!
I've created a pull to fix bug 49348 - when undefined properties do not
produce a notice when doing something like $this->undefined++, unlike
regular variables that do.
Unfortunately, this fix seems to require changing signature of
get_property_ptr_ptr(), adding fetch type, which makes it imp
