Andi Gutmans wrote:
I suggest to make those #define's bit flags and then change:
} else if (behavior == INTERSECT_ASSOC || behavior == INTERSECT_KEY)
to
(behavior & (INTERSECT|INTERSECT_KEY))
This idea came to my mind too. I have already commited a working version without
bitflags but in the next d
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hallo Cristiano,
these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
patch is kind of trivial and won't hurt anything :) (INTERSECT_KEY
is just INTERSECT_ASSOC but no data comparison performed).
I will add also array_diff_key() and a
I suggest to make those #define's bit flags and then change:
} else if (behavior == INTERSECT_ASSOC || behavior == INTERSECT_KEY)
to
(behavior & (INTERSECT|INTERSECT_KEY))
Change:
#define INTERSECT_NORMAL 0
#define INTERSECT_ASSOC1
+#define INTERSECT_KEY
Well, i think I have found a buggie (not related to these functions and I want to
investigate it). Thus I will delay the commit.
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hallo Cristiano,
these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
patch is kind of trivial and won't
Andrey Hristov wrote:
> Hallo Cristiano,
> these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
> patch is kind of trivial and won't hurt anything :) (INTERSECT_KEY
> is just INTERSECT_ASSOC but no data comparison performed).
> I will add also array_diff_key() and array_diff_uke
Andrey Hristov wrote:
> Hallo Cristiano,
> these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
> patch is kind of trivial and won't hurt anything :) (INTERSECT_KEY
> is just INTERSECT_ASSOC but no data comparison performed).
> I will add also array_diff_key() and array_diff_uke
Hallo Cristiano,
these 2 function will be added to HEAD in few minutes. I see that the
patch is kind of trivial and won't hurt anything :) (INTERSECT_KEY
is just INTERSECT_ASSOC but no data comparison performed).
I will add also array_diff_key() and array_diff_ukey()
cheers,
andrey
P.S.
Andi: I th
Andrey Hristov wrote:
> is "make test" showing problems? (i am just currious).
> I will try to review the patch later today (atm i am sick).
Nope. Make test shows the same errors before and after the patch.
I decided to attach the patch since it will keep tabs...
Cristiano Duarte
--- array.c 200
Andrey Hristov wrote:
is "make test" showing problems? (i am just currious).
I will try to review the patch later today (atm i am sick).
Which also reminds me that we still dont have a function to merge a
multi dimensional array without messing with the array structures (which
array_merge_recursi
is "make test" showing problems? (i am just currious).
I will try to review the patch later today (atm i am sick).
andrey
Cristiano Duarte wrote:
Hi all,
I needed to intersect an array with database records indexed by the primary
key, with an array with keys and there is no php function that will d
Hello Cristiano,
First, I'd like to say that a function of this type sounds useful.
It's one that I've wanted for some time, particularly for verifying
that an array has the correct keys when it is passed as a function
parameter.
If I understand what you are doing correctly, the same
Hi all,
I needed to intersect an array with database records indexed by the primary
key, with an array with keys and there is no php function that will do it
internally.
The database array looks like:
$records = array ( 2587 => array('Name', 'Address', 'zip'), ...);
And the array with PKS:
$pks
12 matches
Mail list logo
