I'm sorry, I guess I wasn't real clear on that - I've always known this
feature as a source directive, guess I didn't know that's not really an
established term.
What I'm referring to is much simpler than what you suggested - it's just
an equivalent to the "source" pre-processor directive in for e
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
> I hear a lot of interesting arguments in this big annotation discussion,
> and now there's the ongoing vision discussion, which got me thinking.
>
> It is true that there is broad community interest in annotations - part of
> the problem he
I hear a lot of interesting arguments in this big annotation discussion,
and now there's the ongoing vision discussion, which got me thinking.
It is true that there is broad community interest in annotations - part of
the problem here, is that different groups have differing opinions about
precise
